научный журнал по социологии Социологические исследования ISSN: 0132-1625

АЙДИНЯН РАЗМИК МЕСРОПОВИЧ, ШИПУНОВА ТАТЬЯНА ВЛАДИМИРОВНА — 2003 г.

РОМАНОВСКИЙ Н.В. — 2003 г.

НОВИКОВА Е.Г. — 2003 г.

Обзор посвящен двум сайтам, целевая аудитория которых - представители общественных наук. Мы попытаемся рассмотреть их возможности и потенциал, достоинства и недостатки, а также ответить на вопрос: возможно ли в России единое информационное пространство?

КУЛТЫГИН ВЛАДИМИР ПАВЛОВИЧ — 2003 г.

БАНДУРОВИЧ ОКСАНА ЮРЬЕВНА, СТЕГНИЙ АЛЕКСАНДР ГРИГОРЬЕВИЧ, ЧУРИЛОВ НИКОЛАЙ НИКОЛАЕВИЧ — 2003 г.

КРАВЧЕНКО СЕРГЕЙ АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ — 2003 г.

ТЕЛЕБАЕВ Г.Т. — 2003 г.

ЛИДЖИ-ГОРЯЕВА СОФЬЯ ЭРДНИЕВНА, МУНЯНОВА БОВА МУХАРАЕВНА — 2003 г.

ГАСПАРИШВИЛИ АЛЕКСАНДР ТЕНГИЗОВИЧ, МИТЕВА ЛИДИЯ ДИМИТРОВНА, ТУМАНОВ СЕРГЕЙ ВЛАДИМИРОВИЧ — 2003 г.

СТЕПАНОВА ОЛЬГА КИРИЛЛОВНА — 2003 г.

"Notion of 'intelligentsia': fortunes in symbolic space and in time" (by Ol'ga Stepanova) analyses relationship of the above scholarly notion with other similar social stratification categories, applied currently in symbolic (semiotic meaning) space. Namely she discusses terms professional, specialist, expert, clerk, official, manager, 'white collar'. Author shows varying convergence degrees of the given notions ranging from their hundred-percent (professionals in the sense of skilled specialists) to partial (clerks vs. 'white collar' people) co-incidence. Combinations of termini are discussed too - 'intellegentsia' in its sociological meaning, 'middle class', and 'intellectuals'. Partial co-incidence of them is stated on common ground, that is social and professional meaning plane. Substantial part of the paper looks into history of the term 'intelligentsia' usage in Russian symbolic space. In sum, the above notions are still carrying meaningful load, that is, they still are operational in scholarly research.

ТОЩЕНКО ЖАН ТЕРЕНТЬЕВИЧ — 2003 г.

"Subject and structure of sociology of labor" (by Zhan Toshchenko) offers an analysis of varying conceptions in the field of sociology of labor, draws comparisons between them, evaluates their positive and problem-ridden aspects. Basing his deliberations on theory and practices in grasping and studying social resources of labor, author formulates a definition of sociology of labor as a unity of economic consciousness and economic behavior in conditions of specific production environment. This permits the author to suggest a new version of structure for this sociological theory. Its is built on the basis of historical approach, when these or other facets of labor had been gradually comprehended evolving from homo oeconomicus or technological individual to creative, social and political laborer. It is stressed, in particular, that sociology of labor as no other theory is developing in close connection with actual requirements of production.

ААРЕЛАЙД-ТАРТ АЙЛИ — 2003 г.

БЕЛЕНЬКИЙ ВЛАДИМИР ХОНОНОВИЧ — 2003 г.

МАКСИМОВ БОРИС ИВАНОВИЧ — 2003 г.

"Working class, sociology, and statistics" (by Boris Maksimov) is a comment on V.V. Trushkov's paper "Russia's working class today in statistics mirror" published in our journal № 2, 2002. Author complements and develops some ideas set fort by the former contributor, in particular, with regard to workers conditions, their protest activities, and shows importance of cadre worker core preservation. In some details he disagrees with Trushkov as in case of worker strike numbers. Working class does not automatically become meaningful social factor; solidarity and respective consciousness are to be there. He draws sociologists' attention to disappearance of research on working class, as well as to the issue all-important for sociology, that is statistics. Government office for statistics increasingly turns into commercial agency earning money for statistical information.

ЛОНШАКОВА НАДЕЖДА АНАТОЛЬЕВНА — 2003 г.

ТЕЛЕБАЕВ ГАЗИЗ ТУРЫСБЕКОВИЧ — 2003 г.

"Religious identification of population and religious situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan" (by Gaziz Telebaev) analyses religious identification specifics under conditions of a society in transition. Theoretical outlay is based on sociological survey data between 2000 and 2002. Growing interest for religions and religious attendance is stated as typical for post-soviet societies. However, contact with religion was found in a majority of cases to mean respect towards traditions and a symbol for ethnic and cultural identity. Another feature of import is prevalence of religious identificator over the others particularly in case of ethnic communities professing Islam. Again ethnic groups stating their closeness to Islam are generally more religious then those close to Russian Orthodox Church and Catholicism. Overall tolerance and active religious life in Kazakhstan regions were found as well.

МАНСУРОВ В.А. — 2003 г.

РОМАНОВСКИЙ Н.В. — 2003 г.

ЛЕВЧИК Д.А. — 2003 г.

ПОПОВА И.П. — 2003 г.